Iswan Afandi


The purpose of this study is to describe students’ perceptions in the short story entitled Bumi Tak Seindah Dulu by determining: 1) theme; 2) characterizations; 3) the view of the main character (Mother) on the environment in which they live; 4) the relationship between the main character (Mother) and the environment in which she lives; 5) how important the environment is in human life. This type of research is descriptive and qualitative. The theory used is literary reception theory and eco-critical theory. The research instruments are short story text and questionnaire. Data collection techniques used in this research are questionnaire, reading, and note-taking techniques. The results of the study, namely: (1) the theme in the short story entitled Bumi Tak Seindah Dulu, namely environmental damage was perceived by 8 (28%) students and varied themes amounted to 20 (72%) students; (2) the characterizations, which are played by the character Ibu who has caring attitude towards the condition of the teak forest which is perceived by 9 (11.25%) students and varied perceptions of 19 (67%) students; 3) the view of the main character (Mother) on the environment in which they live, namely the character perceives a change in the environment is perceived by 7 (25%), forest care figures are perceived by 9 (33%) students, and varied perceptions are 12 (42%) students ; 4) the relationship between the main character (Mother) and the natural environment, namely the character has a relationship with the natural world is perceived by 11 (40%) students and varied perceptions of 17 (60%) students; and 5) about the importance of the environment in life, namely students said it was important that we continue to preserve the environment, which was perceived by 11 (39%) students and varied perceptions of 17 (60%) students.


short stories, ecocriticism, literary reception

Full Text:



Abrams, M. H. (1971). The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition (Galaxy Books). Oxford University Press, USA.

Afandi, I., & Juanda, N. (2020). (Environmental Value in the Short Story “Apakah Rumah Kita Akan Tenggelam” by Anas S Malo through Student’s Responses (Ecocritical Study)). Kandai, 16(2), 295–314.

Akbar, Y. (2016). Asa dan Hutan Kalimantan karangan Yosimar Akbar. SCRIBD, 1–11.

Baranovicth, N. (2021). The Ethnic Ecocritical Animal: Animal protagonists and ethnic environmentalism in contemporary Sino-Mongolian literature and art. Modern Asian Studies, 55(3), 1015–1063.

Boner, P. J. (2022). Tycho Brahe and the Measure of the Heavens. John Robert Christianson. Renaissance Lives. London: Reaktion Books, 2020. 288 pp. £15.95. Renaissance Quarterly, 75(1), 244–246.

Budiman, M. A., & Untari, M. F. A. (2019). Short Stories on Comparison Literature. Proceedings of the UNNES International Conference on English Language Teaching, Literature, and Translation (ELTLT 2018), July, 58–66.

Claudia, V. S., Suwandi, S., & Wardani, N. E. (2021). Environmental Values in the Folklore at the Region Pitu Village, Ngawi Regency: Literary Ecocritic Approach. Empowering Human Development Through Science and Education (AECON 2020), 144–151.

de Roo, L. (2021). Sean Cubitt (2020) Anecdotal Evidence: Ecocritique from Hollywood to the Mass Image. Film-Philosophy, 25(3), 386–389.

Ferrari, C., Mancini, F. M., Damiani, G., Dini, V., Figliomeni, M., Avellis, L., Marcheggiani, S., & Mancini, L. (2019). Environmental damage and environmental mediation: Italian guidelines. Microchemical Journal, 149, 103993.

Garrard, G. (2004). Ecocriticism (the New Critical Idiom). In London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group (Vol. 53, Issue 9). London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Glotfelty, C., & Fromm, H. (1996). The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology. University of Georgia Press.

Goga, N., & Pujol-Valls, M. (2020). Ecocritical engagement with picturebook through literature conversations about Beatrice Alemagne’s On a Magical Do-Nothing Day. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(18), 1–16.

Griffiths, D., & Kreisel, D. K. (2020). Introduction: Open Ecologies. Victorian Literature and Culture, 48(1), 1–28.

Iser, W. (1980). The Implied Reader. The Johns Hopkins Univesity Press.

Koolen, C., van Dalen-Oskam, K., van Cranenburgh, A., & Nagelhout, E. (2020). Literary quality in the eye of the Dutch reader: The National Reader Survey. Poetics, 79(February), 101439.

Love, G. A. (2003). Practical Ecocriticism, Literature, Biology, and the Environment. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press.

Malo, A. S. (2019). Apakah Rumah Kita akan Tenggelam karangan Anas S Malo. Ruangsastra.Com, 1–3.

Mohebalian, P. M., Lopez, L. N., Tischner, A. B., & Aguilar, F. X. (2022). Deforestation in South America’s tri-national Paraná Atlantic Forest: Trends and associational factors. Forest Policy and Economics, 137(February), 102697.

Oakley, W. (2019). T imothy M ichael , British Romanticism and the Critique of Political Reason . Romanticism, 25(2), 211–212.

Sharipova, D. (2019). The decolonization of the environment in Kazakhstan: The novel final respects by Abdi-Jamil Nurpeisov. Nationalities Papers, 47(2), 296–309.

Takagi, H., Esteban, M., Mikami, T., Pratama, M. B., Valenzuela, V. P. B., & Avelino, J. E. (2021). People’s perception of land subsidence, floods, and their connection: A note based on recent surveys in a sinking coastal community in Jakarta. Ocean and Coastal Management, 211(March), 105753.

Umam, K. (2019). Bisikan Tanah. Ruangsastra.Com, 1–4.

Verma, A., & Singh, R. (2021). An Ecocritical Reading of T . S . Eliot : An Approach Towards Sustainable Development. Problems of Sustainable Development, 16(1), 45–49.

Willis, I. (2021). Reception Theory, Reception History, Reception Studies. In Oxford Research Encyclopedias. Oxford University Press.

Самутина, Н. (2020). Ускользающие читатели: трансформации популярной культуры на русском языке как вызов исследователям литературных практик. Russian Literature, 118, 1–24.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

e-ISSN: 2988-4357



Google Scholar